Circumcision became popular during Victorian times to deter masturbation. The scar tissue reduces penile sensitivity. We now know that masturbation is harmless yet continue to mutilate our infants.
1) Urine is sterile unless you have an infection
2) Women pee from their genitals as well, in case you haven't noticed. Not to mention all the bacteria on all skin and mucous membranes in particular to protect them
3) It is harder to tell the difference between cut and uncut when erect as the foreskin "disappears" and to some its hard to tell the difference between a band of scar tissue and a band of mucous membrane which is also a different colour than the surrounding skin.
Evolution is proven. Look at hardy-weinberg equilibrium, all the things that have to happen for evolution not to occur. Microevolution occurs on a human time scale and is proven. Macroevolution is recorded in the fossil record and is proven.
My five year old brother is smarter than some of the people on here, geez. Go crack open a science book. Circumcision has always been for cultural reasons, all those medical "benefits" are BS.
hi. I'm English and most guys get rediculed here for being cut. it's usually only practised if there's obvious medical reason to do it.
anyway, I've seen many uncut and cut penises, and for guy or girl to not know if a dick's cut or not, they're stupid. it's obvious.
also, I've found that almost a hundred percent of the time, the guys with no foreskins cum wayyyyy too early!
definitely underage pussy. Middle school probably. and very dumb. Doesn't know what a cock looks like, let alone how to treat one right. Sounds like UT Austin material
3:00 you are a boy who is cut. of course you will say that the FACTS that it is more sensitive etc are false because you want to make yourself feel better. too bad you will never know. though there is something you can do.. regenerate the foreskin. look it up
1132 The most sensitive part is the under side of the head on the vast majority of penises. The extra skin while providing friction prevents direct stimulation to that area because the skin is loose. There has never been a proven study to support your theory. You are just trying to draw a conclusion on something that does not correlate. You're probably some dumb girl that has no idea what a dick is other than a glorified hotdog for them to suck
@3:00
Yes, I am a girl. However, I'm not basing my knowledge off of the semen that I ingest. It's called anatomy and biology classes. You see, I'm getting an education. I don't assume that I know more just because I play with it all day long.
Any guy that think their dick is uncircumsiced but still "clean" is a dumbass there's bacteria that builds up in there even if you wash it every time you piss which im sure no guy does get over it your dick is dirty...even if you wash
Yes, there is an increased risk of penile cancer for uncircumsized men. However, this is one of the rarest forms of cancer and it can be prevented with the HPV vaccine (which they give to women). Other than that, cut vs. uncut is purely a cultural/religious choice. I'm cut myself but I would like to allow my son to make that choice for himself.
Circumcision can mean not having enough skin on the penis, which means not having full erections without pain, hair on the shaft and unnecessary friction against the vaginal opening.
If you the uncut dicks are "weird" or "awkward" you don't have enough experience with them, if they are "unclean" the boy is just lazy, if they are "ugly" then you have been impacted by american culture, and shouldn't use that as an argument because it is an opinion, not a fact.
um there's nothing dirty about it, in fact i'd guess that uncut guys wash more just to make sure while cut guys dont htink they have to (wrong)...it's not like bacteria just hangs out there anymore than it does on the creases of your eyelids...it pulls taught, so it's not like you're cleaning out a cave, it's ridiculously easy to clean....sooooo much misinformation/cut guys posting to make themselves feel better
The schools that won't teach evolution have been subject to a sort of Christian book burning. Why Christians try to impede scientific progress is beyong me. Sounds like they realize and are afraid of the truth, doesn't it?
To clear things up: sex is better for uncut guys. Im a guy, and i have tried both (had surgery). Cut guys have no idea what they miss out on, thank your parents for that. My girlfriend at the time noticed very little difference. Less and less infants are being mutilated in the US every year. It's a retarded tradition/ cultural thing. Nuff said.
1227 I was uncut then got cut. I enjoy sex better and it is more sensitive being cut. So before you spout off about ignorance you should probably know what you are talking about
Do you hear how dumb some of you sound. Uncut is more sensitive, but guys that are cut cum wayyyy quicker? Wouldn't that be the opposite dipshits? And HIV can be acquired through numerous things ie Blood dumbasses, it isn't something that can be trapped under a dick skin, because if your partner has HIV and isnt wearing a condom whether he is cut or not is going to have no effect on whether he gets it.
America is the only developed nation that routinely practices it. How is using a historical analogy moronic? Science is being manipulated to support a cultural tradition, just like it was during slavery.
He either has a hoodie or not, and who gives a crap anyway. They all work the same, those uncircumcised just get a lil more feeling out of it. As long as he is clean, have fun with it!
I just laugh at all the idiots saying it is mutilation and barbaric. Do any of you have piercings, tattoos, braces or go tanning? If so what you do to your body is just as bad if not worse. Do us all a favor and quit pretending to be so cultured when you are too stupid to see the hypocrisy in your own lives.
My last bf wasnt circumsized and it was definitely not dirty or smelly, nor was there "extra skin flopping around" and i actually found it easier to give him hand/head because there was more to work with
The potential for penile cancer in later years is greatly increased in those with foreskin intact.
Also more at risk for prostate problems, erectile dysfunction among other undesirables.
haha my first was uncircumsized so i didnt know the difference, but he let me know he was uncircumsized....so i guess if she never saw it soft she really wouldnt know
Every one saying that I'm going to hell for being un circumsized is a retard and needs to read the bible why would god give it to you that way if you were not supposed to have it f yall
I'm a California girl so I like the skanky uncut guys. It's cool if their penises look like alien invaders and who cares if they have more diseases anyway? Are diseases bad?
As a female it is very difficult to tell the difference when the male is hard. There isn't extra skin 'flapping around'. The foreskin is taught when hair..and it move. Occasionally with jacking you can feel alittle...but it's not a problem nor gross. I've had both, and it feels the exact same.
I think it's funny that all the circumsized males on here are calling it gross. And talking about sensitivity. How the he'll do you know?
Having sex with a guy who is uncircumcised is the same as sex with a guy who is. As a female you don't feel a difference.
As a male I can't really tell you.
As long as the guy is well groomed and cleans properly then there should be no problem.
The problem I see with this txt is how did this chick not notice. That must have been some boring se. I mean did she touch it, look at it, suck it? Seriously how young and or stupid do you have to be to not know after that much time?
EVOLUTION IS NOT A MYTH YOU IDIOTS IT HAS BEEN PROVEN OVER AND OVER CREATION IS A MYTH WITH NOT ONE OUNCE OF PROOF.. even so "God" put you here with skin on your dick so get a grip no one has died from not being circumsized. More and more stupid people are born every day..
@ 1:27 It is more likely that religion, rather than evolution is not taught in schools. You evidently harbor some hatred towards Christians that you need to learn to deal with. Good luck to you.
339 and you know this how? I know a lot of people that made the choice in adulthood to do it. I am also one of those people. I have had sex with and without foreskin. I can tell you definitively that there was no sensitivity lost and that sex actually feels better being cut. That is why I laugh at these girls that try and talk like they know, WHEN THEY DON"T HAVE DICKS. People are naturally going to defend what they are.
Get out of here with your facts and your science asshole. Stop trying to justify being unclean. It's fucking disgusting. Die 1000 deaths and burn fog eternity in the flames of the impure you dogs
411 read 355. Also flapping around I assume is an exaggeration. Even when hard though. There is a ridge of skin visible below the head on an uncut guy, very similar to somebody wearing Under Armor or a skin tight shirt. While it doesn't hang there it is easily identified.
How did you not know? Did you only see it with a condom on? How dark was it?
I found out my bf was uncircumcised the first time we were together. It really doesn't make a difference as long as he takes care of it
1) You have to be an idiot to say they look the same hard. You can see the saggy extra skin it may not cover the head when erect but you can still see it
2) Getting circumcized properly actually increases stimulation being that there is more direct contact with the head and underside of the head(which is the most sensitive)
3) Whoever said evolution has n't been proven....I really have no retort that your feeble mind could understand so we will just leave it at that
I love the uncuts trying to make it sound cool...or even acceptable. As a cut man myself, I can assure you there is no need to be any more sensitive down there....SPLAT!!!
to 10:30 am, how long has it been since you were cut At first your dick will be more sensitive because it hasn't had a chance to keratinize. Just wait till it callouses and tell us that it is more sensitive. Also, males who are cut as adults made the choice to do it, which I am in no way against.
to 9:12am, I said that we have the highest percentage of MALES with HIV. In the US two-thirds of people with HIV are male, but worldwide two-thirds are female, which is from africa and the countries you listed.
323 in order for something to be fact by definition it has to be proven empirically.. otherwise it is just a bunch of opinionated BS perpetuated by guys that are pissed because they have schmega and the women that actually see their dick think they are gross. SO where is this proven data?
9:53 you are a fucking idiot who should die in a house fire. America doesn't have the highest percentage of HIV. Ever heard of Africa? Sierra leone? Almost 50 percent of the population has HIV. If we were higher than that, pretty much every other person would have it.
1132 Not all cocks look like an anteater, but I can tell immediately in porn if a guy is uncircumcized or not. WHILE HARD. So if you aren't perceptive or smart enough to draw that distinction don't assume the rest of the population is.
@1035
tattoos, self tanning etc however are not done to babies before they have a chance to say no. if they were thered be a pretty big problem... Circumcision is fine as long as you have chosen to do it, and it was not imposed upon you by society/mommy
soooooo gooood! sex with uncircumsized penises is like heaven. Think about this. you've been having sex with him since february, almost a year. theres def a reason you keep going back.
Yeah, you people are touched. There are no health risks to having a foreskin. There are health risks to unprotected sex and bad hygiene, but that applies across the board. You circumcision fetishes are weird man. I'd say this is a good night for her, but I can't figure out how you wouldn't know, circumcised dicks don't move up and down and are usually dried out.
Circumcision is a ancient, unnecessary practice that serves no purpose (unless there are genuine, medical problems with the foreskin) and as time goes on the head of the penis becomes desensitised. I know it is still common practice in the US, sadly, so I expect this comment to not be all that well received. Like everything else we are born with, the foreskin has a purpose (several, actually). Sorry to go on but I have seen so many anti-uncut comments on here I had to say something.
Bottom line is that if you are uncut you are unclean. All of the uncircumcised will burn in the fires of hell along with the unbaptized babies and unrepentant sinners. May God have mercy on your souls and your wicke penises.
206 You are a girl. I am pretty sure that I know more about my genitals than you do. Male anatomy knowledge is not acquired through massive amounts of semen ingestion. And I wasn't saying there was anything wrong with being uncut. I was simply saying that these idiots on here spreading false knowledge about sensitivity and visibility should stfu. Every person has there preference and that is their business.
Man hate im gonna say this but ive seen porn with dudes with un cut di cks.....that crap does not look the same as mine when hard....mad extra skin that seems to be going everywhere...ugghhhh.... and i dont see how thats more sensitive with a layer of skin covering ya lol
Comments
You must be Logged in to post a comment